![]() Instead of blanking content with the promise of research and balanced critiques, leave the section as is until you are ready to edit to the balanced version. Completely removing the criticisms section along with the comments "good riddance" is a flagrant pov violation. I reverted to the npov version that includes criticisms. When I get a chance I will attempt to research and include a section with balanced critiques of the game, citing sources. In the interests of NPOV I have removed the criticism section. As I mentioned in my edit summary, the section was full of weasel words, none of the criticisms cited had any sources, and the article lacked any equivalent section for critical praise of the game. My old comments about this section appear to have been moved to the System Shock article's talk page. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |